- Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday celebration, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
- Regret on Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
- Lee Rudolph on Drug scientists trip up, raising paper that is meth write one on LSD
We’re on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
Nine years back this Saturday that is coming August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a web log about retractions?”
Just What has grown to become clear into the intervening nine years is really what a vein that is rich are as tales of what are the results whenever one thing goes incorrect in technology. So when we’ve done on a yearly basis at this time, we’ll review just just just what occurred within the last few year.
Drug researchers trip up, raising meth paper to compose one on LSD
Evidently meth is just a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.
Scientists in Asia have actually lost a 2019 paper on what LSD may damage vision because they’d lifted a lot of the paper from articles which had showed up the entire year before in a journal that is different about methamphetamine.
The article that is retracted “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal harm in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. According to the article:
Writers object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper
A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a set of scientists in Saudi Arabia after getting a “serious complaint” about the integrity regarding the information. However the very first writer of the paper pressed right back, saying the move had been unjustified.
This article, “Successful usage of blended corticosteroids and rituximab in an individual with refractory cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa,” ended up being published by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad healthcare City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic operation. It described (with instead grisly images) the scenario of a man that is 25-year-old serious leg ulcers that remedied after the described combination therapy.
But during the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:
Kyoto University suspends very first writer of retracted Kumamoto quake paper
The initial composer of a now-retracted paper in technology in regards to the outcomes of the life-threatening 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan was suspended from their college place for starters year.
Aiming Lin, associated with Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, ended up being sanctioned because of the organization for misconduct stemming from their misuse of information and plagiarism into the 2016 paper:
Sunday checks out: A sleuth whoever work has resulted in a huge selection of retractions and corrections; an “unethical, dangerous and deceptive” attention study; genetics’ high retraction price
You enjoy our weekly roundup before we present this week’s Weekend Reads, a question: Do? In that case, we’re able to actually make use of your assistance. Can you look at a donation that is tax-deductible help sunday Reads, and our everyday work? Many Many Thanks ahead of time.
Forensics Friday: can you flag this paper if it had been under review?
Ever wished to hone your abilities as being a sleuth that is scientific? Now’s your possibility.
Due to the American Society for Biochemistry and Biology that is molecular(, which can be devoted to educating writers on recommendations in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a string, Forensics Friday.
Take a good look at the image below, and then simply simply just take our poll. From then on, go through the website link below to discover the right response.
Cock and bull tale results in retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper
The ancients possessed a plain thing for hybrids (think animals, perhaps not vehicles): half goat-half people, horses with peoples torsos, winged horses and lions, you will get the picture. But a mix that is chicken-cown’t on that list … until now.
A team of scientists in Brazil has lost a paper in a veterinary log for attempting to reuse information from the chicken research within their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.
The content, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes mitochondrial disorder in cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never impact virus replication,” starred in February within the journal Veterinary Microbiology.
‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey data earn fluorosis paper a banner
A current article that provided a stark caution in regards to the dangers to young ones of fluoride when you look at the nation’s water is tagged with a manifestation of concern following the book of a fresh paper which undermines the dependability associated with the initial information.
This article, “Dental fluorosis trends in US dental health studies: 1986 to 2012,” starred in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a journal that is dental. The author that is first the paper is Christopher Neurath, associated with the United states Environmental wellness research Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.
This article, that used data from the National health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the years 2011 and 2012, reported increases that are“large extent and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to your mid-1980s.
In line with the scientists:
Gravitational industries, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: just exactly How did this “pure, utter nonsense” go into in a peer-reviewed log?
Often, a paper occurs this is certainly so revolutionary, it defies description. Therefore versus attempt to do justice to a recent paper in Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a couple of paragraphs right right here:
Leech paper nets phrase of concern
Articles claiming to uproot the evolutionary tree of leeches has gotten a manifestation of concern after a audience notified the log about possible issues with the information.
The content, “Phylogenomic analysis of a putative link that is missing reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press name, on June 19 of the 12 months. In line with the writers — a worldwide group that includes scientists during the nationwide Museum of Natural History, the new york Museum of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results: